बाजार भाव लोड होत आहेत...

Thursday, December 26, 2024

Labour set to strengthen anti-hunting laws with plan to issue huge fines to fox hunters



Labour is set to strengthen anti-hunting laws with plans to prosecute hunters if foxes are killed through "recklessness", moving away from the current requirement to prove deliberate killing.

The Government has pledged to ban trail hunting, where dogs follow an animal-based scent, amid growing concerns about illegal foxhunting continuing in England and Wales.



Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Minister Mary Creagh recently reaffirmed Labour's commitment in the Commons, stating the party would provide "significant protections to wild animals, including foxes and hares".

The proposed changes come nearly 20 years after the Hunting Act 2004 was introduced by Tony Blair's Government.


Fox hunting

Trail hunting has already been suspended on Ministry of Defence land since Labour took office in July.

New data from the League Against Cruel Sports suggests illegal foxhunting remains widespread, with 186 reports of foxes being pursued by hunts between August and the start of the hunting season in November.

The animal welfare charity documented 220 reports relating to suspected illegal hunting incidents during the same period.

The figures, released ahead of Boxing Day hunt parades, also revealed 553 cases of "hunt havoc" - disruptive behaviour affecting rural communities.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:



These incidents included trespassing on farmland, worrying livestock, hunt hounds loose on roads and attacks on domestic animals.

The League Against Cruel Sports says the data demonstrates the need for stronger legislation to close existing loopholes in hunting laws.

Chris Luffingham, acting chief executive of the League Against Cruel Sports, said: "These figures show that the Boxing Day hunt parades are a charade, hiding a world of brutality that has never gone away in the 20 years since the Hunting Act was introduced."

He called for urgent Government action to strengthen hunting laws and "stop foxhunting once and for all".



Fox hunting

"Not only does so-called trail hunting need to be banned, but the loopholes in the Hunting Act need to be removed, and custodial sentences introduced for those caught breaking the law," Luffingham added.

He challenged claims by hunts about following pre-laid trails, stating: "If hunts were really following pre-laid trails and trail hunting as they constantly claim, none of the recorded incidents would have occurred."

The National Trust, one of Britain's largest landowners, banned trail hunting in 2021 amid concerns the practice was being used to mask illegal foxhunting.

Scotland has already implemented stricter measures, with its parliament voting to ban trail hunting in January 2023.



The Scottish legislation made it illegal to use more than two dogs to chase or stalk wild mammals without a licence.

However, data from Scotland's first hunting season under the new law showed at least 41 licences were issued for using packs of dogs, with only two being monitored for compliance.

Robbie Marsland, Lacs Scotland's director, expressed concern that mounted hunts were claiming to participate in drag hunting as a smokescreen.

The Scottish experience has increased pressure on England and Wales to revisit their own legislation.




from GB News https://ift.tt/GYFjvWE

Wednesday, December 25, 2024

Rural Labour MPs set to be targeted by farmers in new wave of protests


Rural Labour MPs are set to face a fresh wave of protests next month as farmers escalate their campaign against inheritance tax changes.

The National Farmers' Union (NFU) has announced a national day of action on January 25th, with demonstrations planned across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, reports The Times.


Farming groups will organise tractor rallies in various locations away from Westminster, specifically targeting Labour MPs in marginal rural constituencies.

The protests mark an intensification of farmers' opposition to tax changes introduced in Rachel Reeves's October budget.


\u200bFarmers protesting in Whitehall

NFU president Tom Bradshaw said farmers would not back down from fighting the "destructive" policy.

"There is too much at risk – our families, our future, our heritage and the undermining of the very sector that produces a safe, secure supply of British food," he said. Roadside banners will be put up along main roads to catch MPs' attention as they travel over Christmas.

The January 25th protests aim to show "unity and strength" among farmers across the UK. Bradshaw thanked the public for their "ongoing support" in the campaign against what farmers are calling the "family farm tax".

Under the changes announced in the budget, farms worth more than £1 million will face inheritance tax for the first time.m The policy introduces a 20 per cent levy on farming assets above this threshold, rather than the standard 40 per cent inheritance tax rate.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS


Tom Bradshaw

Farming groups say the tax could devastate family businesses and risks creating a mental health crisis among older farmers.

The NFU warns that many older farmers may not be able to utilise the existing provision that allows estates to be handed down tax-free if the owner lives for another seven years.

Local authorities across Britain have passed motions opposing the tax changes, putting pressure on Labour MPs in rural areas.

Twenty-two councils, including those in Cornwall, Kent, and Norfolk, have voted against the policy in recent weeks. The rebellion has left many newly-elected Labour MPs at odds with their local authorities and rural constituents.

WATCH: Farmer Andrew Ward says farmers will 'step up' their action 



A government spokesman said the changes to agricultural and business property relief would affect about 500 estates a year.

The spokesman told The Times: "For these estates, inheritance tax will be at half the rate paid by others, with ten years to pay the liability back interest-free.

"This is a fair and balanced approach which fixes the public services we all rely on.”The spokesman added that ministers’ support for farmers was “steadfast”, with £5 billion committed to the farming budget over the next two years.



from GB News https://ift.tt/ibWrFpG

Tuesday, December 24, 2024

Ed Balls SLAMS Labour’s WASPI betrayal in devastating tirade: “They can't blame Sue Gray for this!”


Ed Balls has slammed Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves for betraying WASPI women, taking particular aim at Labour’s total lack of political nous handling the affair.

The former Labour Shadow Chancellor, who is married to current Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, attacked his party for ‘failing to grip difficult issues’ and ‘inflicting another problem on themselves’ and ‘needlessly raising expectations’.


Speaking with George Osborne on their podcast Political Currency, Balls said in disbelief: “What are they {the government] doing? What did they expect? They can’t blame Sue Grey for this one.”

It comes after Labour announced last week there would be no compensation for women born in the 1950’s who claim they were not informed their pension age was changing from 60 to 66.


This was after an independent ombudsmen recommended compensation should be paid out, something Labour say would cost £10billion and is unaffordable given the nation’s finances.

But angry women born in the 1950’s have highlighted the fact many Labour cabinet ministers including the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Liz Kendall backed the WASPI campaign in opposition, criticising the Tories for not paying out.

Balls, 57, reminisced how as Shadow Chancellor in the 2010’s he did not commit to reversing the Conservatives’ decision to raise the state pensione age because Labour was being sensible and responsible opposition.

Talking with podcast co-host George Osborne who was Chancellor at the time, Balls said: “In the period of 2015, you changed the state pension age.

“There was some outcry. Rachel Reeves, as shadow Work and Pensions, persuaded you to make some changes.

“I, as shadow chancellor, made no commitment ever to go back and reverse what you were doing.

“We knew while there details which were controversial, the underlying reality was this was something which was consensual.

“And that's where we were. Responsible, sensible opposition realising that it's not going to pick up the tab for the WASPI campaign.

“Then, in 2019, within the general election campaign, Jeremy Corbyn as Labour leader suddenly decides to back the WASPI campaign, reverse the whole thing. As you say, [committing] tens of billions of pounds.”


George Osborne and Ed Balls

Balls explains this was because Labour was polling badly and going to lose the 2019 election. Backing the WASPIs was seen as a way to win votes.

The crucial thing is what happened after Corbyn had gone as Labour leader, as Balls explained: “Jeremy Corbyn goes. Rachel Reeves and Keir Starmer and others don't.

“The WASPI campaign continues to rumble around. As you say, an Ombudsman report says there was a case of compensation.

“And Liz Kendall, before the 2024 election, says we will need to look carefully at the Ombudsman's report in government.

“There's no manifesto commitment to do anything either way. She's just said she’s going to look at it.

“In no sense does Rachel Reeves, the Shadow Chancellor, or Keir Starmer shut the WASPI compensation claim down.

“They don't go back on the 2019 commitment to the WASPIs, nor do they put it in lights they're going to compensate them. It's just parked as ‘we're going to assess this’.

“And then this week, out of the blue, with no pitch rolling at all, with no preparation, they announce there will be no compensation.”


Balls, who presents ITV’s Good Morning Britain, then attacked Labour’s timing of the announcement in a brutal takedown.

The former Strictly Come Dancing star said: “I mean, this is essentially a Treasury decision, really, as much as a DWP decision.

“At a time when compensation is happening for post office workers, the Horizon scandal, there's compensation for contaminated blood victims. The government has announced it's going to do compensation for LGBT members of the armed forces who lost their jobs.

“Suddenly, out of the blue, they announce there's not going to be compensation for WASPI women. And it's carnage.

“All these Labour MPs who posed with these placards campaigning for WASPI women, suddenly they're told there'll be nothing.

“This is a problem for Labour, because Labour have raised expectations. Kemi Badenoch gets to say in Prime Minister's Questions this week; ‘I never did that. You're the guys who misled people.’

"If you’re a Labour MP, you might be going to a pensioner's Christmas lunch soon.

“You might be just going into the town centre and meeting people in the streets. You're going to be meeting women in their 60s, WASPI women, pillars of the community. The people who have grandchildren, have elderly relatives, have organised a pensioner's Christmas lunch, who are all going to be coming up to you and saying, ‘I don't want a mince pie. How come you suddenly decided not to do any compensation for people like me, people who've lost out?’


Liz Kendall previously supporting Waspi campaign and Waspi protest

“And, of course, this is happening in the same week people would have got their winter fuel allowance. And I think it's just landed from nowhere.

“Now, I'm not saying we should be doing the Ombudsman's report and doing up to £10 billion for compensation.

“Although, to be honest, if you have an independent Ombudsman report who says do something, it does cause you a bit of a problem.

“But if you say nothing, and then announce you're going to do nothing, then it's not surprising people get very upset and angry and feel as though they've been betrayed.

“Because they were told this could be looked at in government, and you've got now scores, potentially triple figures, of Labour MPs saying, ‘what's happened?’

“You’ve got Scottish Labour MPs, who've got Scottish elections coming up in 15 months' time, saying first the winter fuel allowance, now this.

“If you're going to do nothing, you have to have said that years ago. You have to have said that before the manifesto.

“You’ve got to differentiate between people affected by contaminated blood or the post office scandal or LGBT people who lost their jobs or nuclear test veterans, they're different from WASPI women.

“There must be some principles which you set out which allow people to see who's going to get compensation or not."

LATEST FROM MEMBERSHIP:


Balls then attacked Labour for leaving a policy vacuum around WASPI women.

“But if you leave a policy vacuum for years around WASPI women, it's no surprise, the political response to that is big,” he said.

“Do not underestimate how much this is going to roll.

"To say something like this out of the blue, to say ‘you are illegitimate in your concerns’ to someone you stood with on the campaign trail and backed, I mean, where's the politics?

“You cannot blame Sue Gray for this one.

“This is about central communications and political strategy. It's about whether the number 10 and the Treasury are gripping difficult issues coming down the track before they blow up in front of you.

“And the idea that you do it the week before Christmas at the same time you're taking the winter allowance away from women in their 60s who are the absolute galvanising stalwarts of the community and then think, ‘how did this happen?’ I mean, what are they up to?

“The thing I would say about the end of the year for Keir Starmer is it's been tough. The polls are challenging, and the economy has been bad for them.

“They've made some mistakes, but it is fixable. They've got to stop these self-inflicted problems. It’s what you do if you govern well, you grip.”

Labour argues a survey from 2006 showed 90 per cent of women in the relevant age group knew about the planned state pension age changes.

It also says there is “evidence on the ineffectiveness of unsolicited letters that the ombudsman did not take properly into account”.

Ministers also claim the country can’t afford compensation and that it would be: “impossible to deliver a tailored compensation scheme taking into account individual circumstances that is fair, value for money and feasible”.

The Liberal Democrats are expected to force a vote on the WASPI compensation with their upcoming opposition day in 2025.

Like when the Conservatives forced a vote on changes to farmers’ inheritance tax last month, the vote would force many Labour MPs who have publicly backed the WASPIs in opposition to publicly vote against their compensation.



from GB News https://ift.tt/y9AUDno

'They never take a day off!' Thousands of migrants predicted to cross the Channel over Christmas as masses gather in French camps


Thousands of migrants are preparing to cross the Channel to the UK over Christmas as weather conditions look set to improve, GB News Home and Security Editor Mark White has warned.

Border Force has been placed on high alert as calmer seas are expected for five to six days, beginning late Christmas Eve.


Exclusive footage obtained by GB News showed hundreds of migrants gathering at makeshift camps along the northern French coast, with many more expected to arrive as conditions improve.

"What we are expecting is thousands potentially to come across during that window in the weather," White told GB News.


Migrant camp

"The winds will be very light indeed. So ideal, although it's cold out there, but ideal conditions in terms of being able to cross, because there will be very little in the way of wind," White explained.

GB News producers counted more than 500 migrants at a single camp near Dunkirk at Grand Synth, with hundreds more spotted along nearby roads.


Detailing the camps, Mark told host Martin Daubney: "This is a place called Grand Synth, which is near Dunkirk. Just one camp alone had more than 500 people in.

"There are multiple camps in the Dunkirk area. Then you go further down the coast around the Calais area, more camps as far down as the Boulogne area. Thousands, not just hundreds, but thousands, are now massing along the northern coast of France."


Migrant camp

Discussing the Labour Government's desire to "smash the gangs" and organised networks enabling such crossings to the UK, Mark stressed that any plans put in place by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer will "take time" to come into fruition.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:


Mark stated: "Anything that Sir Keir Starmer implements is likely to take some significant time before it comes fully to fruition.

"But on the other hand, with the so-called deals that are being hatched with these countries around the globe, they were being hatched under Rishi Sunak as well."

He added: "In fact, the vast majority are not deals to return people to those countries, but there are deals which is effectively a bit better cooperation between law enforcement agencies."

Noting another "issue" for the Labour Government and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, Mark told GB News that their claims of deporting 13,000 migrants are "disingenuous", and is in fact a much smaller percentage.


Mark White

Mark concluded: "They've been pointing to the fact that under Labour, they have returned some 13,000 people back to their home countries. This is completely disingenuous.

"Five per cent of those 13,000 people are people that arrived on small boats - the vast majority of people were visa overstayers that got into the country by other means, and foreign national offenders as well, having served their sentence and being returned to their own countries.

"A tiny proportion of those people that are being returned and that are being hailed as a triumphant enterprise by the Government, a tiny percentage, just five per cent, are people that came across on small boats."



from GB News https://ift.tt/5s2bK7h

Monday, December 23, 2024

Nigel Farage hailed as the 'only thing' preventing UK-US relationship from 'going off the rails': 'I have full faith in him!'


US commentator Lee Cohen has raised concerns about Peter Mandelson's appointment as UK Ambassador to the United States, describing it as an "extraordinary choice" that has "raised eyebrows and temperatures" across the pond.

Speaking to GB News, Cohen highlighted the significant challenges Mandelson could face in building an effective UK-US relationship during President-elect Donald Trump's administration.


The commentator pointed to ideological differences between Mandelson and Trump's circle, suggesting that the former Labour minister's "elitist Blairite mindset" would be "antithetical to Trump and his circle's way of thinking".

"It is difficult, really difficult, to imagine that he will have any cachet or gain much purchase in Trump world 2.0," Cohen added.


Nigel Farage, Donald Trump, Peter Mandelson

Cohen questioned whether any "right thinking US Presidential administration would want to engage closely with the Prince of Darkness", referring to Mandelson's well-known nickname.

Despite his concerns about Mandelson, Cohen expressed confidence in Nigel Farage's ability to maintain the special relationship between the UK and US.


"I have full faith in Nigel Farage that he knows what he's doing, and he really has an outstanding relationship with President Trump," Cohen told GB News.

He suggested Farage's involvement could be crucial, stating: "Thank heaven's for that, because that could be the only thing to keep the special relationship from going off the rails."


\u200bLord Peter Mandelson

Cohen highlighted Trump's preference for an "entrepreneurial way of getting things done effectively", noting that Farage understands this approach.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:


The commentator expressed particular concern about Mandelson's pro-EU stance and its potential impact on relations with Trump.

"Trump is a world leader that demands loyalty," Cohen said, suggesting that Trump would want assurance of UK support in trade, defence and intelligence matters.

He emphasised that while Mandelson "has been effective for the European Union," the focus should be on "the UK's interests and the USA's interests and the interests of the shared relationship".

Cohen acknowledged Mandelson's reputation as a "very skilled operator" and suggested he might have been "the best of Starmer's choices" from within his camp.


Lee Cohen

However, the commentator remained sceptical about Mandelson's potential effectiveness in Washington.

"From an ideological standpoint and from the standpoint of having made indiscreet remarks about a president who really demands loyalty and really prizes loyalty, it's difficult to imagine he's going to be able to be part of conversations that really matter in Washington," Cohen said.

"He's not going to want any half measures," Cohen also warned.

He also emphasised that Mandelson would "need to recruit all of his skills that he has honed as the so-called Prince of Darkness to really navigate in Washington."



from GB News https://ift.tt/EWeYozv

What the Key Metrics for Onchain Activity Say About SOL, ETH and Other Chains in 2025

Web3 is drowning in metrics, most of which paint an unclear picture. Transaction volumes, token prices and flashy headlines often mask what really matters: the quality of user engagement and the potential for organic, exponential growth. As the industry moves beyond the hype, reliable, data-driven signals of success are no longer optional — they’re essential.

Here’s the good news: the tools to cut through the noise already exist. By combining multiple on-chain metrics into a single “health index” score indicating the depth and quality of overall user engagement, we can identify which chains are truly thriving and poised for long-term growth. With 2024 coming to a close, let’s dig into what these signals reveal about today’s leading chains, and what we can expect in 2025.

Assessing user quality using aggregated, not isolated, data

When creating a sustainable on-chain ecosystem, it doesn’t make sense to optimize any single user action. What’s needed is context — a way to quantify not just everything users are doing, but how and why it matters. One promising approach to achieve this is to aggregate user behaviors into five core categories:

Transaction Activity, ranging from spot trades to smart contract interactions.

Token Accumulation in the medium-to-long-term, and other “investment” behaviors.

DeFi Engagement for activities like staking, lending and liquidity provision.

NFT Activity such as minting, trading and utility-driven interactions.

Governance Participation to quantify DAO or protocol governance contributions.

Crucially, these metrics should not be treated equally. A better approach is to weigh and combine them using a Bayesian model to generate a single top-line “score.” Unlike traditional scoring systems that rely on static thresholds or simple averages, this lets us incorporate both prior knowledge (what we expect from an “average” wallet) and new evidence (actual activity observed on-chain). These dynamic, multi-variate scores are much harder to game and therefore more likely to reveal accurate, actionable insights.

What the data tells us about 2024

The above approach provides a fresh perspective on each chain’s user activity through 2024. Let’s zoom in on some of the more surprising findings.

Solana (the top light blue line that peaks at ~2.75) attracted a huge share of high-quality users between February and mid-March, but engagement quality has fallen since. Interestingly, this downslide coincided with SOL’s first price and trading volume spike of 2024, and has continued through the current memecoin mania. Repetitive actions have diminishing returns when assessed using a Bayesian model, meaning multiple token swaps yield smaller score improvements than engagement across multiple types of activities, for any given wallet. This suggests most Solana users are currently engaged in a narrow range of on-chain activities that aren’t contributing to Solana’s multi-sector growth.

As for Ethereum supporters (the bottom orange line that begins at just above 1) who expected this year’s ETH ETFs to be a game-changer, the numbers paint a different picture. Ethereum’s low and stable user score through H1 2024 suggests that this year’s bullish developments did not spur broader ecosystem participation such as DeFi activity and protocol governance.

It’s also worth noting that Axelar (the dark blue line that begins at 2.5) had the most active users across the broadest range of on-chain activities relative to its total user base, according to the data. While Axelar is currently much smaller by TVL than the legacy chains dominating today’s headlines, this is an intriguing signal that warrants closer inspection — and would have been missed if we were looking at market cap or trading volume alone.

The takeaway here isn’t that Solana is doomed and Axelar will inevitably become the world’s biggest chain. There is limited value in comparing these types of scores across chains, since each score is proportional to the user quality of its corresponding chain. In other words, a Solana user with a score of “4” may be very different from a “4” on Axelar, given the differences in each chain’s baseline activity. As such, these scores are most useful when tracking changes in the quality of a chain’s overall user activity over time, not cross-chain comparisons.

Predictions for 2025

With that said, what does each chain’s user quality track record tell us about next year?

For starters, it’s clear that Solana faces significant challenges and opportunities entering 2025. The chain’s trajectory depends on its ability to retain its massive casual user base and expand their range of on-chain interactions. Failure to do so could result in a significant slump once memecoins cool off — although data from early 2024 suggests the chain has a large contingent of quality users that will endure regardless of what happens short-term.

2024 demonstrated Axelar’s ability to attract a concentrated user base engaged in diverse, sustained on-chain activities, rather than speculative surges. Now, Axelar’s challenge will be upscaling its ecosystem without diluting the quality of its user base. This may involve prioritizing high-profile partnerships to unlock new audiences while creating more newbie-friendly onramps across its dApp ecosystem.

Ethereum’s fragmentation has shifted many active users to its faster, cheaper L2 ecosystem, and so we may see mainnet activity increasingly consolidate around core features protocol staking and governance. These activities are critical for the broader EVM ecosystem, but this trajectory may be penalized by scoring systems that reward diverse on-chain engagement.

This dynamic underscores a challenge for scoring systems: prioritizing wide-ranging user activity can present an incomplete picture when applied to task-specific networks (or general purpose chains that are evolving into something more specialized). As a result, it’s important to clearly define what success means for whatever chain is being evaluated and use a scoring system that captures the corresponding user actions.

A better way to define, and drive, on-chain growth

Web3 has spent too long chasing the wrong metrics and failing to view the data in aggregate. In 2025, the winners will be those who find multivariate ways to measure — and act on — what matters most: user quality.

By incorporating new scoring methods into their dashboards, on-chain intelligence platforms can provide more meaningful insights to investors and industry observers. At the same time, Web3 builders can use these scores to clarify top priorities and drive user engagement and value creation. Ultimately, this will help the entire industry shift away from hype-driven narratives to data-backed strategies that unlock the full potential of Web3 in 2025 and beyond.



from CoinDesk: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Crypto News and Price Data https://ift.tt/to2CxLV

Starmer handed horrifying early Christmas present as petition demanding 'immediate' General Election FINALLY exceeds 3 million signatures


Sir Keir Starmer has been handed a horrifying early Christmas present after an official petition demanding an immediate General Election finally exceeded three million signatures.

The Prime Minister, who will face a potentially humiliating Westminster Hall debate on the petition in the New Year, was hoping to enjoy some much-needed rest with a festive getaway just as the milestone was met.


Michael Westwood’s petition received an official response from the Government on December 6, with Britons still able to provide further signatures until May 20.

Starmer categorically rejected calls to hold yet another General Election, instead insisting that the Government remains focused on “fixing the foundations, rebuilding Britain, and restoring public confidence”.


Starmer handed horrifying early Christmas present as 3 million sign petition demanding 'immediate' General Election

The petition initially went viral on social media after a number of high-profile politicians shared it with their followers, including Reform UK leader Nigel Farage and Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick.

However, a recent burst of energy from disgruntled voters helped tip the petition past the three million milestone.

Despite going to the polls five times in the last decade, millions of voters want another opportunity to elect MPs to the House of Commons.

The petition comes after a series of measures resulted in Starmer’s support slumping, with Reform UK making major inroads in the Prime Minister presiding over the shortest honeymoon period in British political history.

Axing Winter Fuel Payments for 10 million pensioners, introducing a £40billion tax-hiking Budget and removing preferential inheritance tax breaks for farmers appears to have fuelled much of the discontent directed towards Starmer.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

Keir Starmer

The latest issue of failing to cough up billions in compensatory payments to Waspi women added another layer to Labour’s disapproval, with aggrieved pensioners yet again sharing the petition on social media.

The petition, set up by a disgruntled pub landlord, reads: “I would like there to be another General Election.

“I believe the current Labour Government have gone back on the promises they laid out in the lead up to the last election.”

The total number of signatures is now just 500,000 short of the number of votes cast for the Liberal Democrats in the 2024 General Election, representing around 30 per cent of the ballots counted for Starmer’s Labour.

A petition calling for an immediate General Election during Boris Johnson's premiership failed to exceed one million signatures, sitting at 906,624 when it closed in January 2023.


Keir Starmer

However, several other petitions have also managed to attract millions of signatures in recent years.

A petition to revoke Article 50 and keep Britain inside the European Union received a staggering six million signatures in 2019.

A separate petition demanding a second referendum on Brexit also attracted 4.15 million signatures.

And there is virtually no chance the petition will result in a general election.

Labour returned 411 MPs on July 4, giving Starmer an enormous super-majority.




from GB News https://ift.tt/OKPBptc

Sunday, December 22, 2024

WATCH: Pollster outline Nigel Farage's route to being prime minister


Reform UK could "make Nigel Farage Prime Minister if the party reaches 28 per cent support," according to a shocking new analysis from Electoral Calculus.

Martin Baxter, who runs Electoral Calculus, revealed to GB News that such a scenario would make Reform the largest party in the House of Commons, potentially leading to Farage "becoming Prime Minister with Conservative support."

READ THE FULL STORY HERE



from GB News https://ift.tt/y1Ivhxj

Fury as female councillor shouted at and heckled during meeting about violence against women


A row broke out in a council chamber after a female councillor was heckled during a meeting about violence against women.

At a Bradford Council meeting earlier this month, the leading Labour group tabled a motion calling for more to be done on the issue of violence against women.


Tabling the motion, Councillor Kamran Hussain (Labour, Toller) said tackling the issue of violence against women was a priority for Bradford Council.

He said in the Bradford district, one in four women have experienced gender-based violence.


Bradford city

When Conservative Councillor Falak Ahmed (Bingley Rural) spoke on the topic she mentioned the grooming that was carried out by some men of her same Pakistani heritage.

She stated: "In some communities there is a strong emphasis on family honour, and that can result in harmful practices such as discrimination and gender based violence. Women face societal pressure to conform to specific roles – prioritising family obligations over personal aspirations. One issue that arises from these negative things is sexual grooming."

"The personal characteristics of those who carry out such acts is as varied as the offences themselves. I find it particularly disturbing because much of the hue and cry surrounding this issue involves Pakistani community. Let’s put aside any notion that my culture, heritage or religion condones sexual grooming – not at all.”

She added: "I won’t excuse or justify the heinous, criminal act, and won’t let the perpetrators of Pakistani heritage hide behind any cloak of cultural or religious differences."

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS


\u200bBradford City Hall

Her comments were met with shouts from several councillors across the chamber demanding she apologise for singling out one specific community.

One voice was heard telling the councillor to "shut up."

Cllr Hussain then made a point of order, saying: "By labelling certain characteristics – this is very divisive politics. Let’s not lose the fact that this discussion is about women and girls."

While heckles and shouts continued as the discussion went on, some councillors expressed their anger at the behaviour.


Councillor Matt Edwards (Green, Tong) said: “The behaviour in the last five minutes in this chamber has been appalling. Shouting across a chamber telling a woman, I heard, to ‘shut her mouth’ is completely inappropriate when talking about this issue.”

Councillor Sinead Engel (Labour, Clayton and Fairweather Green) said: "I’m concerned that people sitting around me in this room think that while discussing this motion it is a good idea for a load of men to shout over a woman – I’m appalled by that."

Following the meeting Councillor Mike Pollard (Conservative, Baildon) said he and his colleagues were concerned that aggressive behaviour at council meetings was being normalised, referring to several incidents that had happened.

He said: "That in the space of a few months one councillor has been told to be careful of 'what comes out of that hole in your face' and we now have a female councillor repeatedly interrupted, shouted at and told to 'shut up', in meetings of a Council which holds itself up as a beacon of inclusion and tolerance, somewhat undermines the claim,"

Cllr Ahmed said she was sadly not surprised by the reaction, saying "aggression in the chamber is becoming a regular occurrence."



from GB News https://ift.tt/V0AC8l5

Labour accused of trying to ‘unpick’ Brexit with EU deal for free movement of young people as party ‘pushing at open door'


Shadow Foreign Secretary Priti Patel has accused Labour of attempting to “unpick” Brexit amid Sir Keir Starmer “resetting” the UK’s relationship with the EU.

It comes after a senior Labour MP claimed that calls for a youth mobility scheme were “pushing at an open door”.


Stella Creasy - MP for Walthamstow - suggested that free movement within the EU for young people might be possible with Labour in power, labelling it as a “absolute hot topic” for the Government.

“The good news is, it is being discussed,” Creasy said at a briefing for the Labour Movement for Europe.


Priti Patel; Stella Creasy

“It is very clear that there has been negotiation and movement on there. So we are pushing at an open door.”

Such a scheme would permit those under the age of 30 to live, work and study freely between the UK and other member states.

This news has sparked outrage from the Tories, whose long-divided splits have been further entrenched over years of arduous Brexit negotiations.

Patel said: “Labour can try and deny it all they like, but the whole country can see what their real game is - Keir Starmer is trying to unpick Brexit at every opportunity he can.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:


“Labour have surrendered in every negotiation they've entered from the Chagos Islands to inflation busting pay rises for their union chums, and this clearly won’t be any different.

“The Conservatives will not let them drag us back into the EU via the back door. We will hold them to account.”

Creasy - who is chair of the Labour group - has said that they do not intend to rejoin the EU, but are attempting to “salvage” the relationship.

When questioned on rejoining the EU, she added: “The honest truth is that talks and discussions – even if Europe were willing to entertain it for rejoining – would be a 10 year process.


National Rejoin March in Whitehall

“Frankly, an entire generation of young people do not have 10 years for negotiations.

“They need us to do things now, to salvage something for them, to have a future. And a youth mobility scheme is a starting point.”

Creasy has been tipped to become the next Labour candidate for London Mayor in 2028.

A Government spokesperson said: "There are no plans for a Youth Mobility Scheme and we will not return to freedom of movement."




from GB News https://ift.tt/yIPEOCe

Saturday, December 21, 2024

'Wow!' Reform UK takes Labour seat in MASSIVE swing as one in five Tory voters switch to Nigel Farage's party


Reform UK has flipped a Labour seat ahead of next May's election as a bombshell new poll finds one in five voters who backed the Conservative Party in the General Election have switched to Nigel Farage's party.

At just 18 years of age, Kieran Mishchuk pipped Labour candidate Nicola Nelson to the post, winning the Milton Regis by-election with 272 votes.


The election saw a massive swing from Labour, which lost 33 per cent of its previous vote share, ending with 24.9 per cent.

It follows a series of triumphs for Reform ahead of next May's county council elections.


Nigel Farage

In November 2024, the party secured a Wolverhampton council seat in the Bilston North by-election, unseating Labour.

Additionally, Reform came within ten votes of winning a seat on Sheffield City Council in the Woodhouse by-election, a previously safe Labour seat that was ultimately taken by the Liberal Democrats.

Although Reform's most recent by-election result had a low turnout (17 per cent), by-elections are a bellwether of voter sentiment, so Labour will be worried.

Reacting to the win on X, one user wrote: 'Wow', while another said: "Excellent result. @UKLabour the public are telling you they have had enough."

The Conservatives also have reasons to be nervous.


A new poll conducted by Techne UK has found Conservative voters are switching to Reform in their droves.

The poll found that 22 per cent of voters who supported the Conservatives in July's general election have switched allegiance to Reform UK.

The poll highlighted that among pensioners, Reform UK was now ahead of Labour, with 25 per cent support compared to Labour's 21 per cent.

Conversely, Labour was leading significantly among younger voters under 45. Additionally, Reform UK was found to be ahead among 2016 Leave voters with 38 per cent support, compared to the Conservatives' 36 per cent.


LATEST FROM MEMBERSHIP


Reform rally audience BOO biased BBC as Farage addresses major controversy

Warning, danger ahead 


The biggest challenge Reform will face in the next few years is appealing to the broader electorate, insiders say.

Getting the best people for the job will be key as it grows in size and influence.

Tory veteran Tim Montgomerie is mindful of this now he has defected to Reform.

He told GB News: "They [Reform] have had a problem in the past with certain dodgy candidates getting through. So the party must vet candidates so that they don't have one good May [election] with lots of candidates being elected only to find out those same candidates cause trouble over the following months."

Montgomerie added: "Vetting those candidates will be at least as important as getting them elected."



from GB News https://ift.tt/Aie17xm

Labour say teachers 'should be permitted' to work from home in new education shakeup


Labour's Education Secretary has announced that teachers should be permitted to work from home when completing tasks like marking and lesson planning, in a bid to tackle the growing retention crisis in schools.

Bridget Phillipson told the Observer it was vital that state schools offer more flexible working arrangements away from the classroom, following successful examples already implemented in academy schools.


The move comes as the Department for Education faces mounting pressure over high numbers of teachers, particularly young female staff, leaving the profession.

Under the new proposals, teachers would be allowed to complete marking, lesson planning and pupil assessments from home, while maintaining essential classroom contact time with students.


\u200bEducation Secretary Bridget Phillipson is facing increasing pressure over high turnover

"That's what this Government will do, by taking innovative examples from academies in offering more flexibility without reducing the teaching time with pupils," Phillipson said.

The Dixons Academies trust, operating schools across Leeds, Bradford, Manchester and Liverpool, has already implemented remote working policies for planning and assessment tasks.

"Both are vital. We need to get both right," a government source told the Observer.

Recent figures show 47 per cent of teachers are considering leaving the state school sector due to lack of flexible working opportunities, up from 34 per cent in 2023.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS


A classroom

Women aged 30 to 39 represent the largest group quitting teaching, with over 9,000 full-time female teachers leaving in 2022-23. The latest Department for Education data revealed the teaching workforce grew by only 259 teachers last year, down significantly from 2,844 the previous year.

Daniel Kebede, general secretary of the NEU, called the move "a necessary and welcome step" but stressed it must be coupled with improved pay and reduced workload.

Addressing the education select committee last year, Philip Nye from the Institute for Government highlighted how teaching was traditionally seen as family-friendly due to school holidays.

"But now, perhaps compared to other non-public sector roles, it is not as flexible and family-friendly as it once was," he told MPs.


\u200bDaniel Kebede welcomed the plans

Dr Luke Sibieta, from the Institute for Fiscal Studies, warned that the rise in private sector home working since the pandemic had impacted teacher recruitment.

"It makes teaching a bit less competitive because it can't really offer that kind of work from home or flexible options," he said.

The new Children's Wellbeing Bill, introduced in the Commons this month, includes provisions for all non-academy schools to have the same flexibility as academies regarding teacher working arrangements.

Headteacher Andrew O'Neill, who transformed recruitment at All Saints Catholic College near Grenfell Tower, has already seen success with flexible working policies.


All Saints Catholic College in West London\u200b

His innovations included allowing staff to arrive at 10.45 one morning per week. "One teacher told me having a late start was a gamechanger for the end of term when everyone's exhausted," he said.

"In every other profession we are happy for people to regulate themselves. Why does it have to be different for teachers?"



from GB News https://ift.tt/8ndBiqx

Friday, December 20, 2024

Labour's plan to fix Britain’s 'broken' asylum system to trigger CHAOS for councils as social housing waiting lists soar


New analysis has shown that suggested Labour plans to fix Britain’s “broken” asylum system risk exacerbating housing shortages.

The analysis by The Telegraph shows the proposals risk creating an internal civil war with local councils.


Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner's "pie in the sky" house-building targets are adding further pressure to local authorities, requiring them to build 2.5 properties every minute.

The ambitious construction goals come at a time when councils are already facing significant challenges in managing their housing responsibilities.


Angela Rayne/houses

Analysis shows Newham and Brent councils in London are facing the most severe pressures, with both boroughs having more than 20 per cent of households on social housing waiting lists.

These areas also host more than 30 asylum seekers per 10,000 residents.

Bolton and Islington are experiencing similar challenges, with between 15 and 20 per cent of their households on waiting lists, alongside comparable proportions of asylum seekers.

Luton completes the list of the five most affected local authorities, with between 10 and 15 per cent of its households waiting for social housing.

The data reveals a clear pattern of mounting pressure on local authorities already struggling with significant housing demands.


\u200bBrent Civic Centre

Government rules mean councils have certain quotas to adhere to. For example, the number of asylum seekers in each local authority area cannot exceed 0.5 per cent of the population.

Labour councillor, John Woolf, who has responsibility for homes and neighbourhoods at Islington Council, told The Telegraph: "We are increasingly concerned about the challenges many refugees face in finding stable housing after being granted status.

"Since last year, we have seen a sharp rise in the number of refugees presenting as homeless.

"This is partly due to the faster processing of asylum applications, which is positive in principle, but also because some individuals are being given as little as seven days to leave their accommodation."


A spokesman for Luton Council said: “Luton is at the forefront of the UK housing crisis and currently faces an unprecedented demand for housing.

"Additional pressures are caused by the Home Office policy of accommodating disproportionately higher numbers of asylum seekers in Luton compared with other local authorities in the region.

"While this does affect our housing offer in the town, it mostly impacts the quantity of temporary accommodation options that we have until their asylum is processed."

Labour council leader for Brent Muhammed Butt insisted asylum seekers were not the main cause of pressure on housing stock.

He added: "The pressures on social housing in Brent come mostly from historic sell-offs under Right to Buy and evictions from private landlords, not asylum seekers placed in hotels by the Home Office.

"Ultimately, it is the Government that decides where asylum seekers are housed, and for the provision of their accommodation across the UK."

GB News has approached the Home Office for comment.



from GB News https://ift.tt/T0F2H1Z

Chopper's Political Podcast: Keir Starmer to REVERSE Brexit within 12 MONTHS suggests Tory MP


Sit back, pour yourself a drink and join GB News Political Editor Christopher Hope at his regular table in a Westminster pub where he will discuss the latest insider political intrigue and gossip with everyone from popstars to politicians.

New episodes released every Friday.



from GB News https://ift.tt/B9XRhGS

Who has been given a peerage? Full list of people nominated to House of Lords

Sir Keir Starmer has nominated 30 former Labour MPs, staff and union leaders to the House of Lords.

from Political News - International and UK Politics | Sky News https://ift.tt/7DimvMg

Thursday, December 19, 2024

‘Outrageous!’ Ex-Labour MP erupts at ‘two-tier’ justice as Nigel Farage’s milkshake attacker avoids jail


A former MP has warned that the decision not to jail a woman who threw a milkshake at Nigel Farage will encourage others seeking publicity.

Speaking on GB News, Stephen Pound said: "What really infuriates me is this has shown the green light to any self-publicist."


"They see this as a way to get a few bob and get their name in the papers," he added.

The comments follow the suspended sentence given to Victoria Thomas Bowen, 25, who assaulted the Reform UK leader during his election campaign in Clacton-on-Sea.


Stephen Pound

Pound described the incident as "celebrity assault", calling it "outrageous."

The OnlyFans model threw a banana milkshake over Nigel outside the Moon and Starfish Wetherspoon's pub in June.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS


GB News panel

Thomas Bowen was handed a 13-week suspended prison sentence at Westminster Magistrates' Court.

She was also ordered to complete 120 hours of unpaid work and pay £871.50 in costs and compensation.

In a victim impact statement, the GB News star said he "felt humiliated" with the incident "broadcast on national and international media".

The court heard Thomas Bowen had seen a post advertising his visit to the Essex seaside town online and told police she "does not agree with his political views."


Nigel Farage milkshake attack

The case has drawn comparisons to a similar incident five years ago when John Murphy hit then-Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn with an egg.

Murphy received a 28-day prison sentence for his attack, during which he shouted "Respect the vote!"

The disparity in sentencing has led to accusations of "two-tier justice" from Nigel.

Speaking after Thomas Bowen's sentencing, Pound said: "This stinks on two levels. Proportionality is out of the window."


"The reality is, one person goes to prison for 28 days and the other doesn't even get a slap on the wrist," he added.

Pound suggested the incident would ultimately benefit Nigel politically, stating: "Farage will garner sympathy from this in the same way he did from the Coutts debacle."

District Judge Tan Ikram had emphasised the seriousness of the attack during sentencing.

"This was an attack on a parliamentary candidate campaigning for election. In my judgement this was an attack on our parliamentary democracy," he said.

The judge noted that "parliamentary debate must not be stopped by criminality like this."

Thomas Bowen's lawyer said she "understands the gravity of the situation" and wishes to put the episode behind her.



from GB News https://ift.tt/IUolgGc

'Prince of Darkness' returns as Starmer's new US ambassador

Sir Keir Starmer is to make his most controversial senior appointment yet by naming Peter Mandelson as UK ambassador to the US.

from Political News - International and UK Politics | Sky News https://ift.tt/bUEnTHO

Labour MP tells Britons we're on a 'long journey' amid backlash to winter fuel cut


Labour MP Chris Webb has urged WASPI women to "bear with us" as he pledged his continued support for their compensation battle.

The Blackpool South MP told GB News he has stood with the affected women since 2017 and believes they deserve a fair settlement.

READ THE FULL STORY



from GB News https://ift.tt/ysJI1qc

Wednesday, December 18, 2024

Nigel Farage says trip to Donald Trump’s resort exposed 'contrast' to Britain as he blasts Labour for ‘talking down’ economy


Nigel Farage has highlighted what he sees as a stark contrast between Britain's "doom and gloom" and the optimistic mood he witnessed during his recent visit to Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida.

Speaking on GB News, the Reform UK leader pointed to the "bullishness" he observed among leading entrepreneurs and tech bosses at the Florida mansion.


"Compare that to the doom and gloom we've got here. There's quite a contrast," Nigel said following his meeting with the world's richest man, Elon Musk.

The comments came after Nigel's hour-long discussion with Musk at the Florida estate, where he was accompanied by Reform party treasurer Nick Candy.


Nigel Farage

During the meeting at Mar-a-Lago, Nigel and Musk spent an hour discussing Trump's election strategy in key swing states.

"I spent an hour going through with him what his strategy was - how he got new voters registered, how he used various tech tools to get them out to vote on the day," he told GB News.


Musk, Candy and Farage

The Reform UK leader said he "took copious notes" and "learnt a huge amount" during the discussion.

The meeting was also attended by Reform UK treasurer and billionaire property tycoon Nick Candy, with Nigel describing the encounter as both "great" and "historic".

The group focused particularly on strategies for reaching disaffected communities who feel disenfranchised from the voting process.

The meeting also addressed potential financial support for Reform UK, with Nigel confirming that money was "inevitably" discussed.


"That's a negotiation we would go back and have again. He's not against giving us money, he hasn't fully decided he will," the GB News star revealed.

During the talks, Musk described Labour and the Conservatives as "the uniparty" and expressed concerns about Britain's future.

"He genuinely fears that the mother country of the English-speaking world is going down the tubes," Nigel said.

Writing in The Telegraph after the meeting, he noted that Musk "left us in no doubt that he is right behind us".


The discussions follow reports, previously dismissed by Nigel, that Musk might donate up to £79 million to Reform UK.

The Reform boss emphasised the difference in economic outlook between the two nations during his GB News appearance."

Even if the economy looks worse than it did two years ago, you could argue Labour are talking down the economy themselves," he said.

The Reform UK leader highlighted the optimistic atmosphere he witnessed among business leaders at Trump's Florida estate.

"One thing I saw at Mar-a-Lago were some of the biggest entrepreneurs and tech bosses in the world. The mood and the bullishness..." he noted.

The visit marked at least Nigel's fourth trip to America since his election as MP for Clacton in July.



from GB News https://ift.tt/6DMVdzC

Chancellor campaigned alongside her mother for Waspi compensation

The chancellor campaigned for Waspi women to receive compensation when she was shadow pensions minister - and revealed that her own mother was affected by changes to the pension age.

from Political News - International and UK Politics | Sky News https://ift.tt/Ki2wLYu

Labour’s desperate bid to curb soaring immigration branded a ‘failure from the start’ in brutal verdict as Starmer told plan ‘not guaranteed’ to work


A former UKIP MEP has branded Labour's plan to reduce immigration by boosting British workers' skills as "a failure from the start".

Speaking on GB News, Steven Woolfe, Director of the Centre for Migration & Economic Prosperity, criticised the Government's approach to addressing the UK's reliance on foreign workers.


The comments come as Labour faces scrutiny over its immigration strategy, with Home Secretary Yvette Cooper recently travelling to Rome for talks with her Italian counterpart about tackling illegal migration.

Net migration hit a record 906,000 in the 12 months to June 2023, though figures show a 20 per cent drop to 728,000 in the following year.


Migrants arriving in Britain, Keir Starmer and Steven Woolfe

Sir Keir Starmer has pledged to reform the points-based immigration system, requiring companies employing foreign workers to also train British people.

The Labour leader has accused the previous Conservative government of turning Britain into a "one-nation experiment in open borders" and claims the UK economy is "hopelessly reliant on immigration".

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS


Rachel Reeves

However, Labour has refused to set specific targets for net migration, with Starmer stating that previous Tory targets during their 14 years in power had "achieved absolutely nothing".

The party recently dropped Conservative plans to increase the minimum income threshold for foreign spouses from £29,000 to £38,700.

The Migration Advisory Committee has cautioned against viewing Labour's skills-based approach as a guaranteed solution to reducing immigration numbers.

In its annual report, the committee warned: "Increasing the level of skills in the domestic labour pool does not guarantee a reduction in the reliance on the immigration system."


\u200bSteven Woolfe joined Martin Daubney on GB News


The report emphasised that migrant and domestic workers "are not perfect substitutes" and employers will still seek the best candidates, regardless of origin.

Committee chairman Professor Brian Bell urged the Government to avoid seeing immigration and skills policy as a "one-size-fits all approach" to bringing down net migration.

Woolfe specifically criticised Labour's economic approach, stating on GB News: "British jobs for British workers with a fair pay."

He argued that while Labour's plans to increase the minimum wage for over-18s were "steps in the right direction", the policy was undermined by Rachel Reeves's "tax on jobs".


"You cannot tax people out of existence which is what is happening under Rachel Reeves and have a policy that enables British workers with British jobs and a fair pay in those sectors which are over reliant on foreign workers," Woolfe said.

He emphasised the need for "a more rounded, thoughtful process" to address sectors like care homes and hospitality.




from GB News https://ift.tt/wAOpR1X

Tuesday, December 17, 2024

Former Lib Dem candidate banned from standing as MP after wearing gender critical t-shirt sues party for £90k


A former Lib Dem candidate who was barred from standing as an MP after she wore a gender-critical shirt is suing for £90,000 pounds in compensation.

Natalie Bird has complained about being unfairly targeted for her beliefs after she donned a top with the slogan “Woman: Adult Human Female” to a party meeting.


Bird, who is a domestic abuse survivor, has said she is passionate about safe spaces for vulnerable women.

She was called an “illiberal TERF,” suspended from the Lib Dems and banned from standing as an MP for a decade.


Natalie Bird

Earlier this year, Bird sued for discrimination, and representatives of the Lib Dem membership “conceded the claim.”

The case is now in court again to determine how much she should be compensated, with Bird asking Judge Karen Walden-Smith to award her £90,000 for “injury to feelings” for breach of her membership contract and rights under the Equality Act.

Representing her at Central London County Court, barrister Emma Walker said Bird had been the recipient of bullying due to her beliefs.

It is claimed that her own complaints about harassment by activists in the party were not properly dealt with, while the party has condoned the bullying of members with gender critical views.


Her barrister said: "The claimant is a domestic abuse survivor, and single mother, and is passionate about the existence of safe spaces for vulnerable women, and the ability to have healing spaces after undergoing abuse.

“The claimant has suffered from depression since 2017, which is when the claimant was first threatened with expulsion from the party and called an 'illiberal TERF', with the purpose of silencing, intimidating and bullying the claimant.”

Walker noted how Bird has been “ostracising the claimant for holding a view which she has every right to hold.”

She also said Bird has been painted as a far-right bigot, and her colleagues had destroyed her chances at building a political career.


Natalie Bird

She recounted the day Bird received her suspension letter: “On the day of suspension, 11 December 2018, the claimant was on her way to a meeting of the Wakefield District Liberal Democrat Club and therefore had not read the suspension letter, to discover that the chair of the local party, Dr Peter Williams, has also received a copy of the suspension letter and asked the claimant to leave immediately on arrival.

“This was an extremely humiliating, embarrassing and upsetting experience for her, causing her great upset and harm to her.”

She said the claimant was claiming damages for the loss of the ability to progress within her party including losing her prospective parliamentary candidature of Wakefield, as well as harassment, victimisation and discrimination.

Barrister Nathan Roberts, representing the party membership, said liability had been admitted for Bird’s claim “in an effort to save further costs” at the time when she was only claiming £10,000.


He said: “There is no good reason that the claimant says the claim is now worth four-and-a-half times more than she originally and repeatedly pleaded.”

He added that much of her evidence about her “injury to feelings” was regarding treatment by activists, and pointed out that the party was not liable for the membership at large.

Conceding that she could be awarded £10,000 in total, he said: “The claim clearly isn't worth anything like what she is pleading it is.”

The case is ongoing.



from GB News https://ift.tt/9XWAVzj

Seven asylum hotels to close in the new year

Seven asylum hotels will close in the new year, the home secretary has said.

from Political News - International and UK Politics | Sky News https://ift.tt/PF6iA74

Monday, December 16, 2024

‘It’s Groundhog Day!’ Brexiteers unveil game-plan as Starmer opens door to ‘unpatriotic’ EU betrayal


Brexiteers have set out how Leavers should hold Sir Keir Starmer's feet to the fire after the Prime Minister appeared to open the door to returning the UK to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice.

After a leaked Brussels document revealed that EU negotiators will look to force Starmer to sign up to the ECJ, Brexit bigwigs urged Eurosceptics to launch a two-pronged campaign to prevent pooling sovereignty to the Luxembourg court


Ex-Brexit Opportunities Minister Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg claimed that Tory leader Kemi Badenoch and Reform UK leader Nigel Farage should both make a public commitment to tearing up any accord which relinquishes control over Britain’s legal system.

He told GB News: “Both the Tory and Reform leaders ought to promise if elected to leave any new Labour deal especially if it involves the European Court.


Sir Keir Starmer with Ursula von der Leyen

“Any deal could be devastating for fishermen and re-open the uncounted flood of people coming from the EU, making our migration problem worse.”

Meanwhile, former Brexit Minister David Jones said that Brexiteers should also adopt a grassroots campaign to halt future ECJ overreach.

“Submitting the country to the judgement of a foreign court is a huge degradation of sovereignty,” Jones claimed.

“No patriotic British Government should ever countenance it. Brexiteers in Parliament should use every procedural device to try to stop it.

“Brexiteers outside Parliament should write to their Labour MPs and make clear that they will do everything in their power to ensure they are not returned at the next General Election.”

Brexit alarm bells rung out even louder earlier today after the Prime Minister’s official spokesman refused to rule out the possibility that Starmer could sign the UK up to the ECJ, instead deciding “not to give a running commentary”.

No10 only went as far as to reaffirm its red lines on the customs union, single market and freedom of movement.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

Jacob Rees-Mogg pictured alongside fellow former MP Steve Baker

It is believed that the EU is hoping that the ECJ's jurisdiction over the UK will extend from Northern Ireland to cover both carbon border taxes and veterinary deals.

Despite Rees-Mogg and Jones pointing out what efforts Brexiteers should take to prevent constitutional concessions, ex-European Research Group chairman Steve Baker argued only Labour MPs could stop Starmer from signing up to a sovereignty-pooling proposal.

Baker, who served as Northern Ireland Minister before losing his Wycombe seat on July 4, warned: “This is Groundhog Day. The UK is out and making its way. Any return to the jurisdiction of the ECJ for the whole UK repudiates the result.

“The unique circumstances of Northern Ireland are no excuse: NI has an open border with a foreign, EU country where GB does not.

“There is nothing Conservative, Reform or DUP MPs can do to stop any reversal by the Prime Minister. Only a resolute and well-organised band of Labour MPs could stop him.”

Boris Johnson secured the end of ECJ jurisdiction for Great Britain after then-EU negotiator Michel Barnier claimed the Luxembourg court was a red line for any accord between the UK and Brussels bloc.

Eurosceptics long-bemoaned the ECJ’s apparent overreach, with the Vote Leave campaign highlighting how it restricted efforts to fight terrorism.

Spanish company Factortame provoked particular fury after winning further access to British fishing waters following a lengthy legal battle at the Strasbourg court in 1991.

The Surrender Singh judgement also ruffled British feathers after it appeared to bend migration rules.


European Court of Justice in Luxembourg

However, the UK ranked reasonably highly when it came to winning cases, with a 33 per cent success rate in cases brought against Britain between 2003 and 2016.

The figure put Britain above Italy, France and Germany but behind Ireland, the Netherlands and Denmark.

There have long-been fears that the ECJ would not be a “neutral” player following the UK’s decision to quit the Brussels bloc.

Johnson provoked Brussels in 2023 after looking at ways to remove the ECJ’s already existing oversight over Northern Ireland.

The former Prime Minister doubled-down on his opposition to ECJ overreach in a warning over the weekend.

Writing for The Daily Mail, Johnson argued: “By agreeing to the adjudication of the European court – without even having a judge on the court! – we have junked one of the fundamental principles of Brexit. And to what end?”

The European Commission has today announced its taking the British Government to the Strasbourg court over two alleged violations.

Brussels claimed there were “several shortcomings” in the UK’s implementation of European law that continued to affect EU nationals under Johnson’s Withdrawal Agreement.

The second case concerned Britain’s Brussels-breaking Bilateral Investment Treaties with Bulgaria, Czechia, Croatia, Lithuania, Poland and Slovenia.

Responding to both cases, a Government spokesman said: "These cases relate to issues from when the UK was an EU member state and during the transition period. We are not going to comment further on legal proceedings.

"We remain focused on working to reset our relationship with the EU and to make Brexit work for the British people."




from GB News https://ift.tt/jM7p58w

State pension alert: Confirmed AGE RISE ignites calls to reform Universal Credit to 'alleviate poverty'


Labour is being urged to use savings generated from confirmed state pension age increases to administer target support to vulnerable pensioners.

The state pension age is set to rise from 66 to 67 between 2026 and 2028, delivering around £6billion annually in revenue for Chancellor Rachel Reeves in the Treasury.

However, this increase will have a disproportionate impact on low-income individuals, particularly those who already find it challenging to maintain paid employment until the current state pension age.


A new report from the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), in partnership with the abrdn Financial Fairness Trust, has outlined potential solutions to support vulnerable groups affected by this change.

The report, published as part of The Pensions Review, proposes two targeted support measures that could help mitigate the effects of a higher state pension age.

The cost of these proposed support measures would represent only a fraction of the savings generated by increasing the state pension age.

According to the report's findings, the first recommended measure would provide additional support to those on Universal Credit who are one year below the state pension age.

Do you have a money story you’d like to share? Get in touch by emailing money@gbnews.uk.


Older man worried and Universal Credit application on phone

This would involve a 70 per cent increase to the means-tested Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) benefit's standard allowance for this group, helping to halve the gap between Universal Credit and Pension Credit.

The measure would target those on the lowest incomes and could reduce the relative income poverty rate by around five percentage points, benefiting approximately 30,000 households.

Furthermore, the second proposal focuses on providing increased support specifically to those receiving both Universal Credit and health-related benefits in the year before reaching state pension age.

It is understood that this more narrowly targeted approach would help around 3,000 households escape poverty.

The IFS estimates the first measure would cost £600million annually, while the second would require £200million per year.


\u200bState pension age Britons look at finances

The report's authors, Jonathan Cribb Carl Emmerson and Heidi Karjalainen, acknowledged there would be potential "trade-offs" if these proposed measures were implemented by the Government.

"These measures would help alleviate poverty among those just below the state pension age , but they come with trade-offs," the authors stated.

"Both would directly add to spending on the working-age benefit system, although with costings of £0.6billion and £0.2bn per year."

The trio noted that these sums are relatively smaller compared to the £6bn in fiscal savings that are made every year by raising the state pension age threshold to 67.

They added: "Both options would reduce financial incentives to work for those approaching the state pension age.

"For people of this age who are in good health, this reduction will be of particular concern because their labour market decisions are likely to be influenced by the financial incentives they face.



"In contrast, those in poor health will typically be relatively unresponsive to diminished financial incentives to work.

"But targeting additional support based on health conditions would increase the incentives for people to apply for disability benefits.

"Despite these trade-offs, there is a good case for using some of the public finance savings resulting from a higher state pension age for additional targeted support to the most affected groups.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:


Pensioner worry and empty pension pot

"Not least as this might help maintain public and political support for increasing the state pension age as longevity at older ages increases further."

As it stands, the Government is planning to hike the state pension age from 66 to 67 between 2026 and 2028.

It has also scheduled a further review within two years of the next Parliament to review recommendations for an earlier increase to 68.

In March 2023 an independent review of the state pension age by Baroness Lucy Neville-Rolfe recommended an increase to 68 between 2041 and 2043.

As a result, state pension expenditure would be capped at six per cent of the UK’s gross domestic product (GDP).



from GB News https://ift.tt/hBvr79Z